I joined the Faculty of Health at the University of Canberra in March 2009. Since then I have had the great good fortune to work with remarkable colleagues each day. I have been saving up a post to write about Nursing and Midwifery in the Faculty … a remarkable group of people who have taught me enormous lessons about caring and service.
My links with and interest in nursing and midwifery training date back to my PhD days at the Institute for Educational Development at the University of Surrey in the 1980s. Ann Wickenden helped me understand the transformational opportunities available in the education and training of nurses and midwives. Her study reported on the education of basic general nurses whilst they were working in the clinical setting. “Set against a system where the position of the student is essentially that of an apprentice, previous studies have demonstrated that theory is often divorced from practice and any teaching which does take place is frequently sparse and erratic.” When I read Ann Oakley’s chapter (Interviewing women, a contradiction in terms) in Helen Robert’s book on Doing Feminist Research (1981) I realised how much I had to learn about ethnographic enquiry and the very special bonds developed by carers, mothers and babies in maternity settings.
The nursing curriculum at the University of Canberra fosters the development of critically reflective registered nurses. Staff use an evidence-based model of clinical placements, the Clinical Education Units. They focus on integration with community and industry connections for student learning, as well as working with the nursing community in forms of research and development. Their vision is for “our nursing graduates to be critically thinking nurses who challenge the status quo, clearly articulate their concerns, and use evidence to develop effective practice solutions”.
Midwifery is viewed as “relational, practical work between childbearing women and midwives which is based on specific knowledge, skills and attitudes”. The midwifery curriculum is student centred, process oriented and competency based, designed to meet the standards of a practice based discipline. The midwifery staff’s vision is that our future midwives “will be kind useful midwives”.
There are ten full time staff members in Nursing and three in Midwifery. These smaller numbers “allow for strong relationships and direct support which is not possible at larger universities. We see students to support their learning, give feedback on assignments or clinical practice, offer course advice and pastoral care, or just to talk together about the work we love.”
What I admire so much about the staff in Nursing and Midwifery is that their practice delivers practitioners who love their profession and embody the kindness and care essential for all our flourishing. They would be a remarkable group in any setting. At the University I think they set a gold standard of performance to which many of us should aspire.
Meet some of them here:
Nursing and Midwifery at the University of Canberra
Le Tour
Each year in Australia SBS provides great coverage of the Tour de France. Each year we sit up in the early morning and watch remarkable feats of endurance … and hope in the most naive way that we are witnessing the true expression of mano-a-mano.
The Commons has some great images of the race many years before SBS’s coverage. I find them remarkably evocative and a powerful stimulus to consider the expression of the human spirit through sporting endeavour.
Photo Credits
Champs Elysees
First Tour de France
Climbing over a closed railway crossing
Hit by a car
Schepers drinking water
Ezquerra in the mountains
Performance and Auto Suggestion
A fortnight ago I wrote a post about deliberate practice. Whilst writing that post I was thinking about Sergei Rachmaninoff.
I had read about his anxiety after the premiere of his first symphony. Maurice Kougell quoted Martin Bookspan:
The year was 1897 and the place was St. Petersburg. The occasion was the premiere of the First Symphony of the twenty four year old composer, Sergei Rachmaninoff. It was a complete fiasco; Rachmaninoff himself described how he sat in rapt horror through part of the performance and then fled from the concert hall before it had ended. At a post concert party which had been arranged in his honor for that evening, he was further shaken and ill at ease but the crowning blow came the next morning when the reviews appeared in the News. Cesar Cui wrote: “if there was a conservatory in hell, Rachmaninoff would get the first prize for his symphony, so devilish are the discords he places before us.”
Maurice Kougell observes that “this combination of events was too traumatic for a personality as sensitive as Rachmaninoff’s. He was seized with a fit of depression and apathy from which he could not rouse himself. For two long years it lasted. Finally, friends persuaded him to see one of the pioneers in the field of autosuggestion, Dr.Nikolai Dahl.” Some years later Rachmaninoff dedicated his Piano Concerto No. 2 in C Minor Opus 18 to Nikolai Dahl.
Peter Chou adds the following information:
From the beginning of January 1900 until April, he went daily to Dr. Dahl to receive treatment while lying in an hypnotic doze in an easy chair in the doctor’s apartment. This treatment consisted of the almost ceaseless repetition to him of the words: “You will begin to write you concerto… You will work with great facility… The concerto will be of an excellent quality…”
So remarkable was the success of this principle of auto-suggestion over the inertia of his inner self that his creative powers began to function by the beginning of the summer. He wrote anew with increasing fluency. Ideas and thematic material welled up with all the facility of those now so seemingly far-off days when he wrote “Aleko” in little over a fortnight. The andante and finale of the C minor Concerto, Op. 18, came to him in this way, before the opening movement, and were completed by the autumn of 1900, and given their first performance at one of the Prison Charity Concerts organised by Princess Lieven in Moscow in connection with a prisoners’ aid society. Siloti conducted when Rachmaninoff played; and at these concerts as well as the composer other notable artists who appeared were the cellists, Pablo Casals and Brandoukov, the violinist, Eugene Ysäye, and Fedor Chaliapin.
The C minor Piano Concerto was completed by the spring of 1901, and also the Suite, Op. 17, for two pianofortes, briefly sketched out the previous autumn. As already mentioned the concerto received its first performance in England at a London Philharmonic concert of 1902, the soloist being Basil Sapellnikoff. Rachmaninoff dedicated the concerto to Dr. Dahl as an expression of his gratitude for the success of his care. As no one saving the doctor, the patient, and his cousins knew of the “cure” there was considerable speculation as to the reason for the dedication. The completion of this large work shattered whatever remained of an inferiority complex in the psychology of Rachmaninoff.
Marianne Tobias (2003) points out in a book with the delightful title Classical Music Without Fear that, after spending time with Dr Dahl, Rachmaninoff produced his second symphony “which weighd in at 320 pages in the original manuscript”. She observes that “herein you can find all the Racmaninoff hallmarks: luscious melodies, boisterous dances, passionate introspective writing, emotional fervour, and bold, rich orchestration.”
This story and the discussion of deliberate practice focus my thoughts on the confidence coaches and athletes need to perform. I am particularly interested in how coaches develop their narratives with athletes and how athletes themselves use (if at all) self talk. Perhaps this is why I am so interested in the possibilities of horse whispering.
Photo Credits
Like Whispers in the Fog
When photography turns social experience
Discipline + Defence + Red Shirts: A Winning Formula at the 2010 FIFA World Cup?
The 2010 FIFA World Cup web site has some fascinating information about Spain’s performance at the tournament. In this post I want to draw attention to Spain’s:
- Discipline
- Defence
as characteristics of a winning team. There is something about their kit I would like to share too.
I believe their discipline and defence were exceptional. What is important to note is that Spain started the tournament with a defeat to a lower FIFA ranked team.
As background information here are some details about the sixteen teams who appeared in the Knockout Stages of the tournament:
Country | Games | Goals For |
Goals Against |
Goal Difference | Yellow Cards |
Second Yellow |
Red Cards |
Spain | 7 | 8 | 2 | +6 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
Netherlands | 7 | 12 | 6 | +6 | 21 | 1 | 1 |
Germany | 7 | 16 | 5 | +11 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
Uruguay | 7 | 11 | 8 | +3 | 9 | 0 | 1 |
Paraguay | 5 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
Brazil | 5 | 9 | 4 | +5 | 7 | 0 | 1 |
Argentina | 5 | 10 | 6 | +4 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
Ghana | 5 | 5 | 4 | +1 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
Portugal | 4 | 7 | 1 | +6 | 8 | 0 | 1 |
Slovakia | 4 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
England | 4 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Korea | 4 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Chile | 4 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
Mexico | 4 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
Japan | 4 | 4 | 2 | +2 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
USA | 4 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
Discipline
Spain had a very small number of yellow cards given to them throughout the tournament. Five of their eight cards were in the Final. Compared to their opponents they had fewer yellow cards and conceded fewer fouls. They received no yellow cards in four of their games. The game against the Netherlands was the first game of the tournament where Spain were given a yellow card in the first half of a game.
Opponent | Fouls Conceded | |
Spain | Opponent | |
Switzerland | 8 | 21 |
Honduras | 9 | 19 |
Chile | 13 | 21 |
Portugal | 13 | 18 |
Paraguay | 12 | 25 |
Germany | 7 | 9 |
Netherlands | 19 | 28 |
Here are the patterns of their games:
Game 1
Game 2
Game 3
Game 4
Game 5
Game 6
Game 7
Spain had an admirable discipline and defence record in the 2010 World Cup. After their first game defeat to Switzerland they conceded only one more goal (Chile in the qualifying group). Spain did not concede a goal in the Knockout Stages of the tournament.
Defence
Spain’s defence was more disciplined than their opponents throughout the tournament in terms of the fouls conceded and in limiting shots at goal. Their performance exemplified the suggestion that attacks win games, defences win championships. The final Group Game (Game 3) was the only occasion when an opponent equalled the number of shots Spain made.
Opponent |
Shots |
|
Spain |
Opponent |
|
Switzerland |
24 | 8 |
Honduras |
22 | 9 |
Chile |
9 | 9 |
Portugal |
19 | 9 |
Paraguay |
16 | 9 |
Germany |
13 | 5 |
Netherlands |
18 | 13 |
Red Shirts
Spain is referred to as La Furia Roja. Martin Atrill and his colleagues reported in 2008 that:
Since 1947, English football teams wearing red shirts have been champions more often than expected on the basis of the proportion of clubs playing in red. To investigate whether this indicates an enhancement of long-term performance in red-wearing teams, we analysed the relative league positions of teams wearing different hues. Across all league divisions, red teams had the best home record, with significant differences in both percentage of maximum points achieved and mean position in the home league table. The effects were not due simply to a difference between teams playing in a colour and those playing in a predominantly white uniform, as the latter performed better than teams in yellow hues. No significant differences were found for performance in matches away from home, when teams commonly do not wear their “home” colours. A matched-pairs analysis of red and non-red wearing teams in eight English cities shows significantly better performance of red teams over a 55-year period. These effects on long-term success have consequences for colour selection in team sports, confirm that wearing red enhances performance in a variety of competitive contexts, and provide further impetus for studies of the mechanisms underlying these effects.
Spain played four of their games in the World Cup in red shirts and three in their away, blue, strip. They lost their first and only game of the tournament whilst wearing red shirts. They received the World Cup trophy in their red shirts despite playing the game in their blue shirts.
A Winning Team
The combination of discipline and defence marked Spain out as a distinctive team at this World Cup. In the semi-final against Germany no yellow cards were given to either team. Both teams in that game conceded fewer than ten free kicks each (Spain 7 and Germany 9). Spain’s defence was so effective that they did not concede a goal in the Knockout Stages of the tournament.
Photo Credit
Old and Wise
FIFA World Cup Final in Toronto
2010 FIFA World Cup: After the Final Whistle
At this World Cup I have been following:
- Goal scoring patterns.
- Game outcome in relation to FIFA Ranking (May 2010).
- Referees for each game.
The official web site for the World Cup has provided enormous detail about each game and the tournament.
I have collected all my posts at this page. After 64 Games at the 2010 World Cup here are some observations:
- 145 goals were scored in the tournament. 101 goals in the Group Stage. 44 goals in the Knockout Stages.
- 59 goals were scored in the first halves of games, 84 in the second halves and 2 in extra time.
- In 54 out of 57 games the team that scored first did not lose (the remaining games were 0-0 draws).
- Nigeria, Cameroon and Brazil were the only teams to score first and lose.
- In 51 out of 64 games the higher FIFA ranked team (May 2010) won.
- The higher ranked teams that lost were: Greece (v Korea), Serbia (v Ghana), Cameroon (v Japan), Spain (v Switzerland), France (v Mexico), Germany (v Serbia), Cameroon (v Denmark), France (v South Africa), Serbia (v Australia), Italy (v Slovakia), Denmark (v Japan), USA (v Ghana), Brazil (v Netherlands).
- There were two penalty shoot outs. The higher ranking team won both shoot outs. The team that took the first penalty in these shoot outs won. The team that scored the first penalty won in both games.
- 24 referees officiated at the World Cup.
- No yellow or red cards were given in the Germany v Spain semi-final.
Next stop is Brazil in 2014.
Photo Credits
World Cup Stadium 2010
Lonely Traveller
Semi Finals at the 2010 FIFA World Cup: Outputs
I wrote a post before the semi finals of the 2010 FIFA World Cup. The post noted some of the inputs going into these two games from the four teams involved.
The outputs of the games were:
- Higher ranked teams (FIFA Ranking May 2010) won both games
- The team that scored first won both games
- Spain continued its remarkable discipline record and received no cards from the referee in the game v Germany
These are the Castrol Index data for the games:
Time Lines
Game Statistics
Deliberate Practice: What Coaches Can Learn From Pianists
This morning on Classic FM (Australia) Margaret Throsby had a telephone conversation with Boris Berman about the Melbourne Festival of the Piano. Part of the interview was about a one-hour public seminar to be held on Wednesday 7 July. The seminar’s title is On Practice and will be presented by Boris Berman with special guests Paul Lewis and Ronald Farren-Price.
I cannot find a link to a recording of the conversation but was struck at the time by Boris’s clarity about the role of deliberate practice. Quoting Rachmaninoff, Boris observed that “if I do not practice for one day … I notice. If I do not practice for two days … my friends notice. If I do not practice for three days … the audience notices.”
He talked in detail about:
- Linking all practice to the artistic outcome.
- Transforming practice environments.
- The role of mental rehearsal away from the practice environment.
Once again I was struck by the lessons that coaches can learn from exploring the world of performing arts. I am keen to read Boris Berman’s Notes from the Pianist’s Bench.
One reviewer notes that the book starts:
where most diligent students hopefully find themselves presently: in the pratice room. But what a practice room this is! While yours (and mine) consists of four naked white walls with a big black piano in it, Professor Berman’s practice room is a laboratory of experimentation and consideration. His enormous experience in performance practice, spanning all styles from harpsichord to Cage, allows him to approach a topic from several angles at the same time. Berman is especially afraid of exaggeration and dogmatic advice and believes our faults to be the extension of our virtues: “My biggest hesitation about writing this book has been a fear that my advice will be misinterpreted or carried ad absurdum. Guided by the teacher, a young musician must learn to use common sense, both in making interpretive decisions and in deciding on appropriate physical actions to realize them.”
Boris Berman is clear about the role practice plays in performance excellence. His workshop with Paul Lewis and Ronald Farren-Price would be a great resource for coaches from a different kind of bench.
Photo Credit
Piano and/or keyboard
Semi Finals at the 2010 FIFA World Cup: Inputs
Going into the semi final games of the 2010 FIFA World Cup, these are some of the performance characteristics of the four teams remaining.
Alphabetical
Team |
Germany |
Netherlands |
Spain |
Uruguay |
Alphabetical and Group Position
Team | Qualifying Group Position |
Germany | 1 |
Netherlands | 1 |
Spain | 1 |
Uruguay | 1 |
FIFA Ranking May 2010
Team | FIFA Rank May 2010 |
Spain | 2 |
Netherlands | 4 |
Germany | 6 |
Uruguay | 16 |
Games Won
Team | Games Won |
Netherlands | 5 |
Germany | 4 |
Spain | 4 |
Uruguay | 4 |
Goals Scored
Team | Goals Scored |
Germany | 13 |
Netherlands | 9 |
Uruguay | 7 |
Spain | 6 |
Yellow Cards
Team | Yellow Cards |
Spain | 3 |
Uruguay | 6 |
Germany | 8 |
Netherlands | 12 |
Red Cards
Team | Red Cards |
Germany | 0 |
Netherlands | 0 |
Spain | 0 |
Uruguay | 1 |
Games Played at Altitude
Team | Games at Altitude |
Spain | 3 |
Uruguay | 3 |
Germany | 2 |
Netherlands | 1 |
Games Played at Sea Level
Team | Games at Sea Level |
Netherlands | 4 |
Germany | 3 |
Spain | 2 |
Uruguay | 2 |
Some other information
- Germany and Spain have lost to lower ranked opponents in this tournament.
- The referee for the Netherlands v Uruguay game has refereed four games at this tournament. His last game was Argentina v Germany.
- The referee for the Germany v Spain game has refereed three games at this tournament. His last game was USA v Ghana.
After all this information, there is this suggestion too:
Photo Credit
Argentina v Mexico