Contestability in Three Rounds of AFL 2016

Three rounds have been played in this year’s AFL competition.
I have been using the data provided by the AFL to explore the contestability of games.
As with other seasons, I am interested in the relative position of teams at the end of the third quarter in games. This is my visualisation of the data:
I have been thinking about how to characterise each of these games and have come up with this list:
I have used the AFL’s score graphic to exemplify each type of game:
A dominant performance (Sydney v Collingwood, Round 1):
A competitive game for the first quarter (Adelaide v Richmond, Round 1):
A competitive game for two quarters (up to half time) (St Kilda v Collingwood, Round 3):
A competitive game for three quarters (Port Adelaide v St Kilda, Round 1):
A game that was contested over all four quarters (Hawthorn v Western Bulldogs, Round 3):
I have another category that I term ‘contested’. In such games there is evidence of challenge to the game flow. I found what I consider to be three games in this category, one from each round of this season’s games. My example is North Melbourne v Melbourne in Round 3:
I will continue to monitor this taxonomy of games. I am hopeful that it is an inclusive approach to describing performance.

Photo Credit

Aussie Rules at the MCG (Simon Yeo, CC BY 2.0)


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here