I have been following the 2013 Six Nations’ performance data provided by the Official Website for the Tournament.
This is my first look at some quantitative data. I have a Google Sheet of these data here.
Most of the data types are self-explanatory. The one addition I have made is to look at how many more lineouts than scrums there were for Winners and Losers (Lineouts > Scrums).
Over the five weeks, and for the Tournament as a whole, the Winners’ averages (rounded to whole numbers) were:
Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | Week 4 | Week 5 | Overall | |
Win Margin |
11 |
13 |
10 |
9 |
14 |
12 |
Half Time Margin |
9 |
5 |
0 |
5 |
1 |
4 |
Tries |
3 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
Conversions |
3 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Penalty Goals |
3 |
3 |
5 |
7 |
4 |
4 |
Drop Goals |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Possession 1H (%) |
57 |
48 |
42 |
68 |
58 |
53 |
Possession 2H (%) |
46 |
38 |
42 |
42 |
61 |
46 |
Time in Opp Half 1H (%) |
58 |
49 |
40 |
74 |
60 |
55 |
Time in Opp Half 2H (%) |
49 |
39 |
42 |
39 |
66 |
47 |
Pens/FKs Conceded |
11 |
12 |
14 |
9 |
11 |
12 |
Passes |
155 |
96 |
75 |
108 |
126 |
112 |
Offloads |
13 |
3 |
3 |
8 |
7 |
7 |
Lineouts > Scrums |
4 |
6 |
5 |
8 |
4 |
5 |
For the Losers:
Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | Week 4 | Week 5 | Overall | |
Lose Margin |
-11 |
-13 |
-10 |
-9 |
-14 |
-12 |
Half Time Margin |
-9 |
-5 |
0 |
-5 |
-1 |
-4 |
Tries |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
Conversions |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Penalty Goals |
2 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
Drop Goals |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Possession 1H (%) |
43 |
52 |
58 |
33 |
42 |
47 |
Possession 2H (%) |
54 |
62 |
58 |
59 |
39 |
54 |
Time in Opp Half 1H (%) |
42 |
51 |
60 |
27 |
40 |
45 |
Time in Opp Half 2H (%) |
51 |
61 |
57 |
62 |
33 |
52 |
Pens/FKs Conceded |
10 |
11 |
14 |
18 |
13 |
13 |
Passes |
154 |
111 |
130 |
110 |
98 |
121 |
Offloads |
9 |
6 |
7 |
5 |
4 |
6 |
Lineouts > Scrums |
6 |
8 |
7 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
A direct comparison of the five-week Tournament performance for Winners and Losers:
Winners | Overall | Losers | Overall |
Win Margin |
12 |
Lose Margin |
-12 |
Half Time Margin |
4 |
Half Time Margin |
-4 |
Tries |
2 |
Tries |
1 |
Conversions |
1 |
Conversions |
1 |
Penalty Goals |
4 |
Penalty Goals |
2 |
Possession 1H (%) |
53 |
Possession 1H (%) |
47 |
Possession 2H (%) |
46 |
Possession 2H (%) |
54 |
Time in Opp Half 1H (%) |
55 |
Time in Opp Half 1H (%) |
45 |
Time in Opp Half 2H (%) |
47 |
Time in Opp Half 2H (%) |
52 |
Pens/FKs Conceded |
12 |
Pens/FKs Conceded |
13 |
Passes |
112 |
Passes |
121 |
Offloads |
7 |
Offloads |
6 |
Lineouts > Scrums |
5 |
Lineouts > Scrums |
5 |
These are very similar profiles but I am particularly interested in Winning teams’ first half dominance and overall discipline. I think the phenomenography of each game can give us the granular detail.
There was one drawn game in the competition, Ireland v France, in Round 4.