I have managed to catch two of the three Digital Tribes segments on Geraldine Doogue’s Saturday Extra on Radio National.
Both encounters were by accidental listening.
The trail for the first Digital Tribes discussion was:
… there are clearly differences in the way we are processing information, communicating with each other and forming communities of interest. But what are some of the unintended consequences of readers consuming their news online rather than in print — has the accidental reader disappeared? Does it matter? Is the switch to a more visual medium just an aesthetic shift or is it part of a broader trend of simplifying our knowledge base? And how do these differences feed into the broader debate about politics, democracy, and generational wisdom?
Geraldine discussed these issues with Hugh Mackay.
For the second episode the trail was:
With more and more people consuming their news online, communicating, learning and even spending our leisure time online, it’s clear we are in the midst of some profound social changes. But in what ways the online world is transforming how we think of ourselves and each other is still to be determined. Many argue that the screen and its speed is making us less empathetic, less curious, and less able to think through complex ideas—and yet there is also evidence that our IQs are going up as technologies increase the amount of information and stimulation we receive. So, is the digital revolution leading to a cultural focus on reaction rather than rumination, on answers not questions? And is the death of the generalist newspaper a by-product of that change?
McKenzie Wark was the guest for this program.
The third program in the series was a conversation between Geraldine and Kathy Bail. I liked Kathy’s discussion of blended approaches to content creation and curation.
The three podcasts provide a great resource for anyone thinking about changes to reading habits. They have taken me back to my first memory of public libraries in the late 1950s … a reading room full of people reading newspapers attached to dowel. They have taken me forward in my thinking too particularly in regard to editorial integrity and the potential of slow blogging to support real-time blogging.
(I have been thinking about this post since 14 July and have followed up a number of links to the three contributors. Kathy’s discussion of her work at the UNSW Press was the catalyst for this post after a couple of days of reflection.)
City Public Library
Live-Blogging 100 Aspects of the Moon, after Yoshitoshi
Have you heard?
Thanks for sharing this link, Gordon.
Its a little bit ‘sad’ when you lie awake listening to something on the World Service and find yourself thinking – I wonder if Keith would be interested!
Not sad … wonderfully altruistic!
[…] this week I wrote about accidental reading and the role of editors. That post was prompted by a Radio National discussion about changes in […]