Winning First

The first Ashes Test was completed at Edgebaston in Birmingham on 5 August (link). Australia won on the final day of the test by 251 runs.

Australia scored 487 runs in their second innings. England required 398 runs to win the game on the final day.

Throughout this cricket summer in England, I have wondered if we can predict the outcome of games early in their play after a team has set a target in an innings.

In this test match, I used Australia’s second innings total as a guide to what England needed to do to bat through the final day. I made the assumption that each partnership for England needed to be 49 runs. I was mindful that England was unlikely to score 496 runs in the day but I did have this linear relationship as a check:

The actual profile on Day 5 was:

These data left me thinking about training and competition and how both teams might prepare for the second test at the Lord’s Cricket Ground in a week’s time.

More generally, the result encouraged me to think about the importance of winning first in a series or a tournament.

Photo Credit

Edgebaston (Craig Stevenson, Twitter)

Looking Back to Batting Partnerships in the 2010-2011 Ashes Series

Background

I used data provided by Cricinfo to record batting partnerships in the five Test Matches played in the 2010-2011 Ashes Series. (Full post here.)

Batting Partnerships

The partnership scores in the five test matches in the 2010-2011 Series were:

Final5

In this series, Australia had 69 partnerships of 39 runs or less (England had 36). England had 10 partnerships in the 100-199 range (compared to Australia’s 3).

Photo Credit

Bradman and Stan McCabe take the field 18 November 1932 (State Library of New South Wales, no known copyright restrictions)