Appropriate?

Bamboo scaffolding

I have spent some time discussing learning in recent weeks.

In one of my conversations, I spoke with my daughter, Beth, about her interest in approriate technology.

I was really impressed with her sense of appropriate technology as small-scale technology. My subsequent reading led me to understand that appropriate technology “is simple enough that people can manage it directly and on a local level. Appropriate technology makes use of skills and technology that are available in a local community to supply basic human needs” (link). I think directness and localness are keys for me in thinking about transformational change.

This does involve profound listening. It requires a sensitivity to relationships of power. It also requires us as Susanto Basu and David Neil (1996) pointed out that technology diffuses slowly (link) and discussed more recently by Deborah Healey (2018) (link).

I believe these conversations will lead me to more reflections about the relationships between appropriate technologies and the pursuit and recognition of microlearning (link).

Photo Credit

Photo by Badal Gyawali on Unsplash

Continuing learning and innocent climbing

I am staggered by the expertise shared openly.

Each day, my inbox delivers treasures that are growing in scale.

Today, thanks to Mara Averick (link), I discovered Danielle Navarro’s personal essay on Bayes factors (link).

Danielle’s post has given me a holiday reading list that will help me redefine my naive Bayes views and thinking.

As I was contemplating the references her post unlocked, I came across these images that I have taken to be the innocent climb of continuing learning and the joy of finding new inclines (aka steep learning curves):

(Source of this idea was from R-Ladies Sydney (link) via Real Python (link))